The Frameworks of Jurisprudential Rules in Legal Review of Voluntary Activities in Iran Libraries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

3 M.A. Student, Private Law, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: In spite that Iran's law has undergone changes throughout the history, its connection with jurisprudence is as strong as in the past, as it refers to jurisprudential rules in searching and processing legal rules. Due to the fact that voluntary activities in libraries are new topics, therefore, in the legal examination of it, the mentioned rules will definitely be referred to, but how to apply these rules in legal examinations in general and in the examination of voluntary activities in libraries in particular, has not been studied so far. The present research tries to show that jurisprudence rules can be used in legal examination only with a certain framework.
Methodology: The required data was collected using the library method and analysis with jurisprudential and legal logic and balanced use of rational perceptions.
The scope of legal studies is limited to Iranian law and the scope of jurisprudence studies is limited to Imami jurisprudence.
Findings: The activity of the "rule of beneficence", was concluded that voluntarily activities in libraries means that a person who undertakes such an activity cannot be blamed for the results of these activities, since his work is beneficial. The "rules of action" indicates that since the person has denied the right of receiving salary with his own will, the library will not be responsible for the denial of salary entitlement.
Conclusion: Application of the two mentioned rules in the legal review is not absolute and includes religious and rational framework. Its religious framework is derived from the relevant rational that if these two rules cause harm, they are not attributed to the religious legislator. The rational framework is the result of rational perception that does not allow the application of these two rules to have unfair results. Therefore, it cannot be considered responsible for a person conducting voluntary activity in one hand and the library organization on the other hand in the legal review of voluntary activity in Iranian libraries, referring to the above jurisprudential rules. The lack of a framework for jurisprudential rules in their legal use, especially in new matters such as voluntary activities in Iranian libraries, causes their implementation without any restrictions, while this application and lack of restrictions may not be intended by the Sharia and customary legislators. It is not intended by the parties for voluntary activities in libraries and may cause violation of Sharia, moral, human and rational principles. If the mentioned framework is taken into consideration, we will not have any shari'a and moral inconsistency in the use of jurisprudential rules in legal review. Iranian law researchers believe that all dimensions of jurisprudential rules are predetermined and no longer require research. But the fact that, this is not the case, and an important matter such as how to use them and their frameworks has not been researched so far. The present research is the first research regarding the application of jurisprudential rules in Iran's legal reviews and the legal review of voluntary activities in Iranian libraries. Therefore, the continuation of research in this direction is strongly suggested.

Keywords

References

آشتیانی، محمدحسن (1418 ق.). رساله فی القواعد الفقهیه. تهران: مؤسسه اطلاعات.
اسکندریان، حسن؛ شکاری، روشنعلی (1393). قواعد فقه، بخش مدنی. تهران: میزان.
اسمیت، ج. د. (1380). فعالیت­‌های داوطلبانه، سرمایه آینده. پیام یونسکو. 32(372)، 20-21.
افضلی، رسول؛ ایرانخواه، احمد؛ مؤمنی، حسن (1397). بررسی نقش سمن­‌ها در پیشگیری از آسیب­‌های اجتماعی، مورد مطالعه: شهر تهران. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 1(1)، 569-592.
امامی، سیید حسن (1377). حقوق مدنی. تهران: اسلامیه.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر(1398). مقدمه عمومی علم حقوق. تهران: کتابخانه گنج دانش، چاپ سیزدهم.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1395). مبسوط در ترمینولوژی حقوق. تهران: کتابخانه گنج دانش.
حرّ عاملی، محمد (1409 ق.). وسائل الشیعه. قم: مؤسسه آل البیت علیهم‌السلام.
حسینی مراغی، میرعبدالفتاح (1417 ق.). العناوین الفقهیه. قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
دانش‌پژوه، مصطفی (1392). مقدمه علم حقوق. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
رمضانی قوام­آبادی، محمد حسین (1394). مطالعه تطبیقی وضعیت حقوقی سازمان­‌های مردم‌نهاد در ایران و فرانسه از تأسیس تا فعالیت. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 6(2)، 568-641.
روحانی یزدلی، مجتبی (1400). نقش سمن­ها در تزویج حقوق شهروندی. مطالعات حقوق شهروندی، 24، ص. 218-189.
زراعت، عباس؛ معین، محمدرضا (1398). مقدمه علم حقوق. تهران: جنگل.
زراعت، عباس؛ مسجد سرایی، حمید (1385). مبانی استنباط فقه و حقوق. قم: حقوق اسلامی.
شایگان، سید علی (1375). حقوق مدنی. قزوین: طه.
شهابی خراسانی، محمود (1398). قواعد فقه (خلاصه تقریر و درس). تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
شیروی، عبدالحسین (1398). مقدمه علم حقوق. تهران: میزان.
عبدی، مرجان؛ عباس­نیا، سید محمد (1395). آینده­پژوهی مدیریت سمن­‌های زیست‌محیطی در ایران 1404. حقوق محیط‌ زیست، 1(2)، 16-29.
عطاء، امیر؛ سالاری، محمود؛ بهزادی، حسن (1394). بررسی عوامل جذب مشارکت­‌های مردمی در کتابخانه‌­های عمومی شهر مشهد. دانشگاه امام رضا علیه السلام. دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، پایان­‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد.
طوسی، محمد (1407 ق.). تهذیب الأحکام. تهران: دار الکتب الإسلامیه.
عاملی، محمد (بیتا). القواعد و الفوائد. قم: کتاب‌فروشی مفید.
عاملی، زین‌الدین (1416 ق.). تمهید القواعد الأصولیه و العربیه. قم: انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
عاملی، زین‌الدین (1410 ق.). الروضه البهیه فی شرح اللمعه الدمشقیه. قم: کتاب‌فروشی داوری.
عبدالهی، عبدالکریم (1388). قواعدی از فقه. قم: بوستان کتاب.
عدل، مصطفی (1373). حقوق مدنی. قزوین: بحرالعلوم.
عمیدزنجانی، عباسعلی (1397). قواعد فقه، بخش حقوق خصوصی. تهران: سمت.
فرجی، حمید (1385). قواعد اصول فقه. تهران: بهنامی.
فنائی، ابوالقاسم؛ نوجوان، داود (1398). نقش اخلاق در قانونگذاری از منظر فلسفه فقه و فلسفه حقوق. حقوق تطبیقی، 15(2)، 269-307.
قربانیان، حسین؛ هراتیان نژادی، مجید (1386). حقوق بیماران و نقش­‌های سازمان­‌های مردم‌نهاد و غیردولتی. حقوق پزشکی،  1(2)، 41-11.
قمّی، محمد (1413 ق.). من لا یحضره الفقیه. قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
قیوم زاده، محمد (1395). قواعد فقه پیشرفته. تهران: بهنامی.
کلینی، محمد (1407 ق.). الکافی. تهران: دار الکتب الإسلامیه.
لطفی، اسدالله (1387). قواعد فقه مدنی. تهران: سمت.
محمدی، ابوالحسن (1397). قواعد فقه. تهران: میزان.
محمدی، ابوالحسن (1390). مبانی استنباط حقوق اسلامی. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
محقق داماد، سید مصطفی (1396). قواعد فقه، ج. 1، بخش مدنی، مالکیت- مسئولیت. تهران: مرکز نشر علوم اسلامی.
مرجانی، سید عباس؛ زارعی، عاطفه؛ بیات، بهروز (1400). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر فعالیت­‌های داوطلبانه در کتابخانه‌­های ایران با ارائه الگوی نظری. کتابداری و اطلاع‌­رسانی، 24(4)، 5-30.
مکارم شیرازی، ناصر (1411 ق.). القواعد الفقهیه. قم: مدرسه امام امیرالمؤمنین (علیه‌السلام).
موحدی لنکرانی، محمد فاضل (1416 ق.). القواعد الفقهیه. قم: چاپخانه مهر.
موسوی بجنوردی، سید حسن (1419 ق.). القواعد الفقهیه. قم: نشر الهادی.
موسوی بجنوردی، سید محمد (1396). قواعد فقهیه. تهران: مجد.
نراقی، احمد. (1417 ق.). عوائد الأیام فی بیان قواعد الأحکام. قم: انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
نوبهار، رحیم (1395). اصول فقه، مباحث الفاظ و قواعد تفسیر متن. تهران: میزان.
واحدی، قدرت الله (1391). مقدمه علم حقوق. تهران: میزان.
References
Freitag, M. (2003). Social capital in (dis) similar democracies: The development of generalized trust in Japan and Switzerland. Comparative political studies, 36(8), 936-966.
Hallag, W. B. (1984). Was the gate of ijtihad closed? International Journal of Middle Este Studies, 16(1), 3-41.
Heery, S. (1994). Promotion of library services in the voluntary sector: the case of Christian Aid. Aslib Proceedings, 46(4), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051351.
Pyati, A. K., & Kamal, A. M. (2012). NGO-Developed Libraries in India: Impacts, Models, and New Possibilities.  published Online:  2012-09-07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2012-0023.
Walters, W. (2002). Social capital and political sociology: re-imagining politics? Sociology, 36(2), 377-397.
Abdi, M., & Abbasnia, S. M. (2016). Future studies Environmental NGOs Management in Iran 1404. Environmental Law, 1(2), 16-29. (in Persian).
Abdullahi, A. (2009). The Rules of Figh. Qom: Bustaneketab. (in Persian)
Adl, M. (1994). Civil Law. Qazvin: Bahr al-Ulum. (in Persian)
Afzali, R., Irankhah, A., & Momeni, H. (2018). Investigating the role of ngo in preventing social injuries, Case study: Tehran. Geography and Human Relationships, 1(1), 569-592. (in Persian)
Al-Hurr al-Amili, M. (1997). Wasail al-Shia. Qom: Aal-ulbayt.
Amid Zanjani, A. (2018). The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence, Private Law. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
Ameli. M. (No Data). Rules and benefits. Qom: Mofid.
Ameli. Z. (1995). Preparing the Fundamentalist and Arabic Rules. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Ameli. Z. (1989). Explain to al- Lumah. Qom: Davari.
Ashtiyani. M. H. (1997). Treatise on the Principles of Jurisprudence. Tehran: Ettelaat.
Ata, A., Salari, M., & Behzadi, H. (2014). Investigating the factors of attracting people's participation in the public libraries of Mashhad. Imam Reza University, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, master's thesis. (in Persian)
Daneshpajooh, M. (2013) An Inteuduction to Law. Qom: Research Institute of the Hawza & University. (in Persian).
Eskandarian, H., & Shekari, R. (2015). The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudenc, Civil Section. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian).
Emami, S. H. (1998). Civil Law. Tehran: Islamiyeh. (in Persian)
Faraji. H. (2006). Principles of Islamic Law. Tehran: Behnami. (in Persian)
Fanai, A., & Nojavan, D. (2020). The Role of Ethics in Legislation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Jjurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Comparative Law, 15(2), 269-307. (in Persian)
Freitag, M. (2003). Social capital in (dis) similar democracies: The development of generalized trust in Japan and Switzerland. Comparative political studies, 36(8), 936-966.
Ghayom Zadeh, M. (2016). Principles of the Islamic Jurisprodence. Tehran: Behnami. (in Persian)
Ghorbanian, H., & Haratiannejadi, M. (2007). The right of diseases and the role of governmental and private departments. Medical Low Journal, 1(2), 11-41.
URL: http://ijmedicallaw.ir/article-1-662-fa.html. (in Persian)
Hallag, W. B. (1984). Was the gate of ijtihad closed? International Journal of Middle Este Studies. 16(1), 3-41.
Hoseyni Maragi, M. A. (1996). Al-Anawin Al-Fiqhiyyah. Qom: Islamic Publications Office
Jafari-Langroudi, M. J. (2019). Inteuduction to Law. Tehran: Gang-e-Danesh. (in Persian)
Jafari-Langroudi, M. J. (2016). Mabsoot Dictionary Terms of Law. Tehran: Gang-e-Danesh. (in Persian)
Kulani, M. (1986). Al-Kafi. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Islamiyeh.
Lotfi, A. (2008). The Rules of Civil Islamic Jurisprudence, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1990). Fiqh Rules. Qom: Imam Amir Al-Mominin School. (in Persian)
Marjani, S. A., Zarei, A., & Bayat, B. (2022). Identifying the factors and components affecting voluntary activities in Iranian libraries and presenting a proposed model, Library and Information Sciences, 24(4), 5-30. doi: 10.30481/lis.2020.238107.1734. (in Persian)
Mohammady, A. (2018). Rules of Islamic Law. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Mohammady, A. (2011). Principles for Inference of Islamic Law. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. (2018). The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence, Civil Section, Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center. (in Persian)
Movahhedi Lankarani, M. F. (1995). Fiqh Rules. Qom: Mehr.
Mousavi Bojunordi, S. H. (1998). Fiqh Rules. Qom: al-hadi.
Mousavi Bojunordi, S. M. (2017). The Rules of Jurisprudence. Tehran: Majd. (in Persian)
Naragi, A. (1996). Avaid al-Ayyam. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Nobahar, R. (2016). Usul al-figh, Linguistic Discussions and Maxims of the Interpretation of Texts. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Qommi, M. (1992). Man La YAhduruhu al-Fagih. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Ramazani Ghavamabadi, M. H. (2015). Comparative study of the legal status of NGOs in Iran and France: from the establishment to work. Comparative Law Review, 6(2), 541-567. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2015.55775. (in Persian)
Rouhani Yazdali, M. (2021). The role of semens in the marriage of citizenship rights. Civil Rights Studies, 24, 218-189. (in Persian)
Shahabi Khorasani, M. (2019). The Rules of Figh. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Shayegan, S. A. (1996). Civil Law. Qazvin: Taha. (in Persian)
Shiravi, A. (2019). Introduction to Law. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Smith, J. D. (2001). Voluntary activities, future capital. Payam -e- UNESCO. 32(372), 20-21. (in Persian)
Tusi. M. (1986). Tahdhib al-Ahkam. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Vahedi, G. (2012). An Introduction to Law. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
Walters, W. (2002). "Social capital and political sociology: re-imagining politics?". Sociology, 36(2), 377-397.
Zeraat, A., & Moein, M. (2019). An Introduction to Law. Tehran: Gangal. (in Persian)
Zeraat, A., & Moein, M. (2006). Basics of Jurisprudence and Law Inference. Qom: Islamic Law. (in Persian)
Zeraat, A., & Moein, M. (2019). An Introduction to Law. Tehran: Gangal. (in Persian)

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics