اعلایی، زهرا؛ احمدی، سلیمان؛ سهرابی، محمدرضا (1398). موانع و چالشهای چاپ و نشر کتاب آموزشی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی. سلامت اجتماعی، 6(3)، 327-341.
جانسون، پگی (1389). مبانی مجموعهسازی و مدیریت مجموعه (ترجمه محسن شمس اژهای، منصور کوهی رستمی). تهران: چاپار.
جعفرنژاد، آتش (۱۳۵۴). بررسی عقاید و نظرات جمعی از کودکان و نوجوانان تهران درباره معیارهای یک کتاب خوب. (پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد). دانشکده دولتی - وزارت علوم، تحقیقات، و فناوری - دانشگاه تهران - دانشکده علوم.
رضی، احمد (1388). شاخصهای ارزیابی و نقد کتابهای درسی دانشگاهی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی،21، 21-30.
غائبی، امیر؛ تاجداران، منصور؛ فهیمیفر، سپیده (1389). معیارهای ارزیابی کتابهای الکترونیکی: سیاهه پیشنهادی. پژوهشنامه پردازش و اطلاعات، 25، 721-743.
منصوریان، یزدان (1392). صد ویژگی کتابهای دانشگاهی کارآمد و اثربخش. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، 17(29)، 1-17.
References
Aalaei, Z., Ahmadi, S., & Sohrabi, M. R. (2019). Obstacles and challenges in the publishing of faculty members’ scientific book in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science. COMMUNITY HEALTH, 6(3), 327-341. (in Persian)
Alpert, A. (2006). Incorporating nonfiction into Readers' advisory services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46(1), 25-32.
Buckland, M. (2012). What Kind of Science Can Information Science Be? J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 63, 1–7. doi:10.1002/asi.21656
Camacho, L., & Spackman, A. (2010). Transitioning to e-books: Usage and attitudes among business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(1), 33-45.
Dali, K. (2010). Readers' advisory interactions with immigrant readers. New Library World, 111(5/6), 213-222.
Dali, K. (2014). From book appeal to reading appeal: redefining the concept of appeal in readers’ advisory. The Library Quarterly, 84(1), 22-48.
Ferri, A. (2015). Book Appeal, Literacy, and the Reader: Readers’ Advisory in practice and theory. See Also, 1(1).
Ghaebi, A., Tajdaran, M., & Fahimifar, S. (2010). Ebook Evaluation Criteria: A Proposed Checklist. Information Proccessing and management, 25(4), 721-743. (in Persian)
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Tejada-Artigas, C. M. (2015). Scholarly publishers' indicators: Prestige, specialization, and review systems of scholarly book publishers. El profesional de la información, 24(6), 855-860.
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C., Ingwersen, P., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., ... & Zuccala, A. A. (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2), 685-699.
Giménez-Toledo, E., Tejada-Artigas, C., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2012). Evaluation of scientific books’ publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 64-77.
Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Purnell, P. J. (2014). The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes. Scientometrics, 98(2), 841-852.
Hug, S. E., Ochsner, M., & Daniel, H. D. (2014). A framework to explore and develop criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities. Int'l J. Educ. L. & Pol'y, 10, 55.
Jafarnejad, A. (1975). A review of the opinions and collective opinions of children and adolescents in Tehran about the criteria of a good book. (master's thesis). Faculty of Government - Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, University of Tehran, Faculty of Science. (in Persian)
Johnson, P. (2009). Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management (Fundamentals Series). 3rd Edition. ALA.
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Patent citation analysis with Google. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 48-61.
Mansoorian, Y. (2013). One hundred features of efficient and effective academic books. Research and Writing of Academic Books, 17(29), 1-17. (in Pesian)
Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., & Nederhof, A. J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Libr. Trends, 50.
Nicolaisen, J. (2002). The scholarliness of published peer reviews: A bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields. Research Evaluation, 11(3), 129-140.
Nisonger, T. E. (2008). The “80/20 rule” and core journals. The Serials Librarian, 55(1-2), 62-84.
Ochsner, M., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2012). Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities. Research Evaluation, 22(2), 79-92.
O'Connor, D. O., & Voos, H. (1981). Empirical Laws, Theory Construction and Bibliometrics. Library Trends, 30(1), 9-20.
Oh, H. C., & Lim, J. F. Y. (2009). Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value? Singapore medical journal, 50(8), 749.
Razi, A. (2009). Indicators of evaluation and critique of academic textbooks. Research and writing of academic books, 21, 21-30. (in Persian)
Smith, D. (2015). Readers’ advisory: The who, the how, and the why. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(4), 11-16.
Smith, J. S. (2019). Assessing the Value of Scholarly Book Reviews among Geographers. The Professional Geographer, 1-14.
Spink, A., Robins, D., & Schamber, L. (1998). Use of scholarly book reviews: implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 364-374.
Stone, S. (1982). Humanities scholars: information needs and uses. Journal of documentation, 38(4), 292-313.
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062.
Thompson, J. W. (2002). The death of the scholarly monograph in the humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship. Libri, 52(3), 121-136.
Torres-Salinas, D., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics. Journal of informetrics, 3(1), 9-26.
Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2014). Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2113-2127.