شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی ابعاد جمع‌سپاری در کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها، موزه‌ها و گالری‌ها با استفاده از دیدگاه خبرگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: جمع‌سپاری با جلب مشارکت کمک شایانی به افزایش ارتباطات، ایده‌های جدید و پربار شدن سازمان‌ها می‌کند. این پژوهش با هدف اولویت‌بندی ابعاد جمع‌سپاری در کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها، موزه‌ها و گالری‌ها به منظور درک بهتر آن انجام گرفته است.
روش: پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ هدف از نوع کاربردی است. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر کیفی-کمی است که در گام اول پژوهش با روش مرور نظام‌مند متون، شاخص‌‏های جمع‏‌سپاری شناسایی شد. سپس از پانل دلفی جهت تأیید شاخص‌های شناسایی شده و مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: در گام اول، ابعاد و شاخص‌های جمع‌سپاری از ادبیات نظری این حوزه استخراج و به وسیله پرسشنامه در اختیار خبرگان قرار گرفت. خروجی این مرحله 12 بُعد در 76 شاخص بود. در گام بعدی، برای برقراری ارتباط و توالی بین ابعاد و شاخص‌ها و ارائه مدل ساختاری از روش مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری بهره گرفته شد که در این روش بر اساس نظرات خبرگان و تجزیه و تحلیل‌های صورت گرفته، اولویت‌بندی جمع‌سپاری در کتابخانه‌ها، آرشیوها، موزه‌ها و گالری‌ها انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش حاضر منجر به طراحی مدل در 11 سطح شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: هدفگذاری به عنوان سنگ زیربنای مدل و تأثیرگذارترین بُعد شناسایی شد که این مطلب نیازمند توجه ویژه سازمان‌ها به این بُعد در هنگام شروع جمع‌سپاری است. ویژگی‌های جمعیت و ارزیابی قدرت هدایت ضعیفی دارند. ویژگی‌های آموزش، بستر جمع‌سپاری، پاداش، انگیزه- انگیزش و حفظ مشارکت و تعامل، قدرت هدایت ضعیفی دارند اما قدرت وابستگی بالایی به سایر ابعاد دارند. حفظ مشارکت و تعامل به عنوان تأثیرپذیرترین بُعد از میان ابعاد جمع‌سپاری شناخته شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Prioritizing Dimensions of Crowdsourcing in Libraries, Archives, Museums and Galleries Using Experts' Views

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Asghari Heine Abad 1
  • Zoya Abam 2
  • Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Knowledge and Information Retrieval, Department of Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: Crowdsourcing is a phenomenon in which any organization uses the population as a resource to perform various tasks and find the best solution for any problem using collective effort and wisdom. By attracting participation, crowdsourcing helps to increase communication, new ideas and make organizations productive. This study aimed at prioritizing the components of crowdsourcing in libraries, archives, museums and galleries in order to provide a conceptual model for better understanding.
Methodology: This qualitative-quantitative research has been conducted by using systematic literature review and Delphi method in order to confirm the identified indicators, and interpretive structural modeling. The statistical population of the systematic review in this research includes research articles related to the basics of crowdsourcing in libraries, archives, museums and galleries from the period 2006 to 2022 AD for English language sources and the period 1385 to 1400 solar for Persian language sources. Based on the Critical Appraisal Skills Program and screening process, 54 works were selected for further review and analysis. The statistical community of experts in Delphi panel and prioritization of components was formed by 25 experts from libraries, archives, museums and galleries who were selected by snowball method.
Findings: First, the aspects and indicators of crowdsourcing in libraries, archives, museums and galleries model were derived from the theoretical literature. They were confirmed by questionnaire conducted with experts in libraries, archives, museums and galleries. The output of this phase contained 76 indicators drawn from twelve aspects. According to the results of data analysis and the ideas of the experts, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method was employed to make relationship between indicators and aspects for designing the model. The result was an integrated model for crowdsourcing in libraries, archives, museums and galleries at eleven levels. Moreover, the aspects of crowdsourcing were divided into four levels according to the power of guidance and influence of each aspect on the other aspects and the degree of dependence of each aspects to other one.
Conclusion: The existing leveling shows that maintaining participation and interaction with a degree of dependence of 12 is the most impressive and Goal setting with a guiding power of 12 has the most guiding and influencing power. Goal setting was recognized as the main aspect, which contained the bases of the model. For starting and controlling any crowdsourcing, managers ought to consider this aspect quite seriously.
The characteristics of the Crowd and Evaluation have weak driving power and little dependence on the system. The characteristics of Training, Crowdsourcing Platform, Reward, Motivation and Maintaining Participation and Interaction have a weak guiding power, but they have a high dependence power on other aspects. Goal setting, Crowdsourcing Ethics, Crowdsourcing Management, Content features and Task features are independent aspects with high guiding power on the system and low dependence power on other aspects. They have the most impact on other aspects and accept the least impact from other aspects. Maintaining Participation and Interaction was recognized as the most sensible aspect of crowdsourcing.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Archive
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Gallery
  • Library
  • Museum
 
Reference
Agarwal, A., Shanker, R., & Tiwari M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 4(36), 457-443.
Alam, S. L., & Campbell, J. (2016). Understanding the Temporality of Organizational Motivation for Crowdsourcing. Scandinavian Journal of Information System, 28(1), 4.
Alam, S. L., & Campbell, J. (2017). Temporal Motivations of Volunteers to Participate in Cultural Crowdsourcing Work. Information System Research, 28(4), 744-759.
Ali‐Hassan, H., & Allam, H. (2016). Comparing crowdsourcing initiatives: Toward a typology development. Canadian Journal of Administration Science, 33, 318- 331.
Al-Aufi, A. S. S.Al-Harrasi, N., & Al-Abri, A. (2021). The effectiveness of using crowdsourcing for improving information services: an action research approach. Library Hi Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
Anastasiou, D., & Gupta, R. (2011). Comparison of crowdsourcing translation with Machine Translation. Journal of Information Science, 37(6), 637-659.
Ashish, A., Ravi, S. M. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain, Industrial Marketing. Management Journal, 36, 443-457.
Azar, A., & Bayat, K. (2008). Designing a business process-oriented model with an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Information Technology Management, 1(1), 3-18.
Azar, A., Tizro, A., Moghbel, A., & Anvari, A. (2010). Designing Supply Chain Agility Model with Interpretative-Structural Modeling Approach. Management Studies in Iran (Lecturer in Humanities), 14(4), 1-25.
Baggett, M. P., Bridges, A., Wise, K., Tanner, S., & Mezick, J. (2014). Populating the wilderness: crowdsourcing database of the smokies. Library hi tech, 32(2), 249-259.
Barber, S. T. (2018). The zooniverse is expanding: crowdsourced solutions to the hidden collections problem and the rise of the revolutionary cataloging interface. Journal of Library Metadata, 18(2), 85-111.
Behl, A.Dutta, P.Sheorey, P., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Examining the role of dialogic communication and trust in donation-based crowdfunding tasks using information quality perspective. The TQM Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. 
Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Schoonbaert, A. K., Pett, D., & Wexler, J. (2019). Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(2), 166-182.
Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, 14(1), 75-90.
Cappa, F., Rosso, F., & Hayes, D. (2019). Monetary and Social Rewards for Crowdsourcing. Sustainability, 11(10), 2834.
Causer, T., Grint, K., Sichani, A. M., & Terras, M. (2018). ‘Making such bargain’: Transcribe Bentham and the quality and cost-effectiveness of crowdsourced transcription. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(3), 467-487.
Chen, C.Du, R.Li, J., & Fan, W. (2017). The impacts of knowledge sharing-based value co-creation on user continuance in online communities. Information Discovery and Delivery, 45(4), 227-239. 
Cupido, K., & Ophoff, J. (2014). A conceptual model of critical success factors for an e-Government crowdsourcing solution. In A. Ionas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on eGovernment, ECEG 2014,  pp. 77-84. (Proceedings). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Cushing, A. L. (2018). We've no problem inheriting that knowledge on to other people: Exploring the characteristics of motivation for attending a participatory archives event. Library & Information Science Research, 40(2). 135-143.
Delfino, M. (2011). Against Biblioblivion: How modern scribes digitized an old book. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2145-2155.
Ellis, S. (2014). A History of Collaboration, a Future in Crowdsourcing: Positive Impacts of Cooperation on British Librarianship. Libri, 64(1), 1-10.
Ellis, L. A., & Pena, A. (2015). Crowdsourcing as an Approach to Customer Relationship Building in Academic Libraries. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 22(3-4), 273-295.
Ferriter, M., Zwaard, K., Kamlley, E., Storey, R., Adams, C., Algee, L., & Jakeway, E. (2019). “With One Heart”: Agile approaches for developing Concordia and crowdsourcing at the Library of Congress. Code4Lib Journal, 46.
Fleet, C., Kowal, K. C., & Pridal, P. (2012). Georeferencer: Crowdsourced georeferencing for map library collections. D-Lib magazine, 18(11/12), 52.
Fuller, J., Hutter, K., & Fries, M. "Crowdsourcing for Goodness Sake: Impact of Incentive Preference on Contribution Behavior for Social Innovation" In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Product Design. Innovation, & Branding in International Marketing. Published online: 10 Mar 2015; 137-159.
Gadiraju, U., Fetahu, B., & Kawase, R. (2015). Training Workers for Improving Performance in Crowdsourcing Microtasks. EC-TEL.
Giannachi, G., Sinker, R., Stack, J., Locatelli, C., Carletti, L., Price, D., McAuley, D., Coughlan, T. & Benford, S. (2017). Artmaps: A technology for looking at tate’s collection. Leonardo, 50(1), 20–26.
Hajibayova, L. (2018), Leveraging collective intelligence: from univocal to multivocal representation of cultural heritage. Journal of Documentation, 74(6), 1190-1203. 
Hajibayova, L., & Latham, K. F. (2017). Exploring Museum Crowdsourcing Projects Through Bourdieu’s Lens. Knowledge Organization, 44, 506-514.
Holley, R. (2010). Crowdsourcing: how and why should libraries do it?. D-Lib magazine, 16(3-4). Available at: http://www. dlib. org/dlib/march10/holley/03holley. html.
Huang, J., Tzeng, G., & Ong, C. (2005). Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26.
Hyning, V., Blickhan, S., Trouille, T., & Lintott, C. (2017). Transforming Libraries and Archives through Crowdsourcing. D-Lib Magazine, 23(5-6).
Ikediego, H., Ilkan, M., Abubakar, A., & Bekun, F. (2018). Crowd-sourcing (who, why and what). International Journal of Crowd Science, 2(1), 27-41. Available on Emerald Insight at: www. emeraldinsight.com/2398-7294.htm.
Jayakumar, T. (2016). Talent house India: crowdsourcing the Indian national anthem. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(4), 12-23.
Jones, C. E., Theodosis, S., & Lykourentzou, I. (2019). The Enthusiast, the Interested, the Sceptic, and the Cynic: Understanding User Experience and Perceived Value in Location-Based Cultural Heritage Games Through Qualitative and Sentiment Analysis. Journal of Computig and Cultural Heritage, 12(1), 1-26.
Ju, B., & Stewart, B. (2019). The right information: perceptions of information bias among Black Wikipedians. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1486-1502. 
Karberg, T., & Saarvet, K. (2016). Transforming user knowledge into archival knowledge. D-Lib Magazine, 22(3-4).
 Kieffer, C. L., & Romanek, D. (2019). Crowdsourcing a Current Events Exhibition on Community Activism Against DAPL. Curator The Museum Journal, 62(2), 135-150.
Kobayashi, M., Arita, S., Itoko, T., Saito, S., & Takagi, H. (2015). Motivating Multi-Generational Crowd Workers in Social-Purpose Work. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1813–1824.
Lang, A., & Rio-Ross, J. (2011). Using Amazon Mechanical Turk to transcribe historical handwritten documents. Code4Lib Journal, (15).
Macdonald, S., & Osborne, N. (2013). Addressing History- Crowdsourcing a Nation's Past. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries: Advances in Geospatial Information, Collections & Archives, 9(1-2), 194-214.
McNaughton, M.Rao, L., & Verma, S. (2020). Building smart communities for sustainable development: Community tourism in Treasure Beach Jamaica. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(3), 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-02-2020-0008.
Munyaradzi, N., & Suleman, H. (2014). A system for high quality crowdsourced indigenous language transcription. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 14(3-4), 117-125.
Munns, D. (2016), Discovering History in a Digital World: The Texas Story Project. Journal of Museum Education, 41(3), 192-201. 
Murano, P. (2018). A new user interface for a text proofreading web portal in a digitization and crowdsourcing context. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 14(3).
Paclíková, K., Weinfurtner, A., Vohnoutová, M., Dorner, W., Fesl, J., Preus, M., Dostálek, L., & Horníčková, K. (2018). Geoinformatics and Crowdsourcing in Cultural Heritage: A Tool for Managing Historical Archives. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics,10(2),73-83.
Parilla, L. L., & Ferriter, M. (2016). Social Media and Crowdsourced Transcription of Historical Materials at the Smithsonian Institution: Methods for Strengthening Community Engagement and Its Tie to Transcription Output. The American Archivist, 79(2), 438-460. 
Paulhamus, B., Ebaugh, A., Boylls, C., Bos, N., Hider, S., & Giguere, S. (2012). Crowdsourced Cyber Defense: Lessons from a Large-Scale, Game-Based Approach to Threat Identification on a Live Network. Conference: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction.
Ridge, M. (2013). From tagging to theorizing: deepening engagement with cultural heritage through crowdsourcing. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(4), 435–450.
Saberian, F., Amirshahi, M., Ebrahimi, M., & Nazemi, A. (2020). Linking digital platforms' service dimensions to customers' purchase. The Bottom Line, 33(4), 315-335.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
Schlagwein, D., Cecez‐Kecmanovic, D., & Hanckel, B. (2019). Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis. Information Systems Journal,  29, 811– 837. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12227.
Seitsonen, O. (2017). Crowdsourcing cultural heritage: public participation and conflict legacy in Finland. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4(2), 115-130.
Sherman, A., & Axelrad, H. (2021). A qualitative study on money, well-being and serial crowdfunding. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(1), 97-112.
Short, J. (2014). Take Ten to Tag! Smithsonian Gardens Public Tagging Initiative. Technical Services Quarterly, 31(4), 319-331.
Stathopoulou, E. K., Georgopoulos, A., Panagiotopoulos, G., & Kaliampakos, D. (2015). Crowdsourcing Lost Cultural Heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2(5/W3). 25th International CIPA Symposium 2015, 31 August – 04 September 2015, Taipei, Taiwan.
Stauffer, S. (2021). Libraries, Archives, and Museums: An Introduction to Cultural Heritage Institutions through the Ages. MaryLand: Rowman & Littlefield.
Suissa, O., Elmalech, A., & Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M. (2019). Toward the optimized crowdsourcing strategy for OCR post-correction. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(2),179-197.
Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., & Gupta, A. (2006). Development of a balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, 25-59.
Trant, J. (2009). Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1).
Van Hyning, V. (2019). Harnessing crowdsourcing for scholarly and GLAM purposes. Literature Compass, 16(3-4): e12507. Available at: wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/lic3.
Wang, M. M., Wang, J. J., & Zhang, W. N. (2020). How to enhance solvers’ continuance intention in crowdsourcing contest: The role of interactivity and fairness perception. Online Information Review, 44(1), 238-257. 
Wang, L.Xu, T., & Chen, J. (2020). Research on decision-making behavior of crowdsourcing task based on loss aversion and incentive level. Kybernetes, 49(5), 1507-1528.   
Wu, W., & Gong, X. (2021). Motivation and sustained participation in the online crowdsourcing community: the moderating role of community commitment. Internet Research,  31(1),  287-314. 
Yarrow, A., Clubb, B., & Draper, J. (2008). Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation. The Hague, IFLA Headquarters. (IFLA ProfessionalReports: 108)
Zahaya, D., Hajli, N., & Sihi, D. (2018). Managerial perspectives on crowdsourcing in the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 41-53.
Zhang, X.Chen, S.Zhao, Y. C.Song, S., &  Zhu, Q. (2019). The influences of social value orientation and domain knowledge on crowdsourcing manuscript transcription: An empirical investigation of the Transcribe-Sheng project. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(2), 219-242.
Zhang, X., Song, S., Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Motivations of volunteers in the Transcribe Sheng project: A grounded theory approach. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 951-953.